ITS - Intelligent Transportation Systems Report ITS Home Page

Appendix B.  Calling List Development and Interview Methods

Two separate lists of motor carrier companies to contact were developed.  The primary source for the first calling list was the FMCSA Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) census file, as of September 30, 2006.  The MCMIS list was chosen as the most current, complete source of contact information on all motor carriers subject to federal regulation.  It was hoped that the MCMIS census file would give the research team a fair cross-section of the motor carrier industry.

In an attempt to increase the representation of CVISN-participating motor carriers in the calling pool, the CVISN self-evaluation reports completed by numerous CVISN states (supported on a separate USDOT task order, BA34009) were consulted to identify a set of states that have highly active CVISN program offerings.  The motor carrier companies pulled from the MCMIS files had these states as their mailing address.6

Table B-1 shows the process that was used to select eight focus states.  Some chosen states appeared in only two of the three columns in the table, while other states appearing in all three columns were not chosen.  The final set of eight states were chosen in part to provide a manageable sized group, with some level of geographic diversity.  For example, Colorado carriers were not included in the final calling list, in part because those from nearby Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma were.

Various records were excluded from the full MCMIS census, to allow the interviews to focus on companies in the for-profit motor freight business and to make the calling process more efficient.  The following four MCMIS carrier classifications

were the only records included in the selection.  This screen excluded companies that primarily transport passengers, trucks owned by government agencies, and trucks whose classification is “Other.”  Also, only companies having a telephone number on file in MCMIS were included.

Table B-1.  Selection process for calling motor carriers located in highly active CVISN states.  (Carriers from the eight shaded states were chosen from MCMIS census file.)

State is Highly Active in:

IRP Electronic Credentialing

IFTA Electronic Credentialing

CVISN Electronic Screening

Colorado

Maryland

California

Indiana

North Dakota

Oregon

Kansas

Michigan

Illinois

Arizona

Arkansas

Missouri

Nebraska

Kansas

Florida

Tennessee

Wisconsin

Colorado

Kentucky

Virginia

Kentucky

Maine

Tennessee

Virginia

New Mexico

Arizona

Georgia

Washington

New York

Indiana

Virginia

Colorado

Tennessee

Wisconsin

Alabama

Utah

Oklahoma

Idaho

Arkansas

Alabama

Florida

Arizona

Illinois

New Mexico

Washington

New Jersey

Kentucky

Oklahoma

New York

Nebraska

West Virginia

 

Montana

Kansas

 

Ohio

New Mexico

 

South Dakota

Montana

 

Texas

 

Source:  State CVISN Self-Evaluation Reports, as of early 2007.

The list of 200 MCMIS carriers (25 carriers each from the eight selected states) was supplemented by carriers from two other sources:  (1) The sets of carriers subscribing to the HELP/PrePass and Norpass e-screening programs.  This represented approximately 50 carriers, based on the programs’ respective public web sites as reviewed in early 2007.  (2) The largest motor carriers, i.e., those with more than $200 million in sales, listed in the Hoover’s online business information directory, representing approximately 40 carriers.  This combined list was matched and merged visually with two other lists:

Any duplicate records were removed.  The final version of this first calling list included 240 motor carrier companies.

The second calling list of approximately 90 motor carriers was developed via a multi-tiered process that collected carrier contact data by sector, geography, and proclivity to be engaged in CVISN.  Specifically, common lists of core CVISN states were used, augmented by carrier “tax & registration” committee lists from state and national trucking associations.  These T&R committees focus on operational, financial, and policy issues, with an emphasis on operating credentials.  The surveys were e-mailed to each carrier member, with follow-up calls or e-mails.  In some cases, interviews were conducted on the first call; otherwise interviews were scheduled at a future date/time.  To increase response rates, several state trucking associations faxed out advance notices, urging carriers to be responsive to the survey/interview process. 


6 The state given in the MCMIS mailing address was used, rather than the carrier’s physical location state.  For some carriers, the two states are different.  Mailing address was taken to be the more likely headquarters or the state where a motor carrier company conducts the bulk of its regulatory and registration/licensing/credentialing transactions.

Previous  |  Table of Contents  |  Next