Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No. FHWA-JPO-08-003 |
2. Government Accession No. |
3. Recipient's Catalog No. |
|
4. Title and Subtitle Concept of Operations for the I-880 Corridor in Oakland, California |
5. Report Date March 31, 2008 |
||
6. Performing Organization Code |
|||
7. Author(s) Oakland Pioneer Site Team |
8. Performing Organization Report No. |
||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address Oakland Pioneer Site Team |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) |
||
11. Contract or Grant No.
|
|||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
|
||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
|
|||
15. Supplementary Notes RITA Contact: Brian Cronin |
|||
16. Abstract This report describes the draft Concept of Operations that has been developed for the Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) program by the I-880 corridor team. The I-880 corridor team has defined this Concept of Operations (ConOps) based on two primary principles: (1) it must improve overall corridor performance by meeting the needs of the local stakeholder agencies, within their practical operational, institutional and financial constraints; and (2) it must focus on integration of pre-existing systems rather than on implementation of new equipment or infrastructure. The I-880 corridor is a truly multimodal corridor, including a robust freeway network, major arterials which carry high volumes of local traffic as well as absorb diversion from the freeway networks, a transit network which includes the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) rail system and multiple AC Transit bus transit lines, and heavy freight movements with trucks comprising between 4% and 11% of the average annual daily traffic in the corridor. Transportation management systems (TMS) have been widely deployed in the corridor for many years including: a) ramp metering on I-880; b) HOV lanes and HOV bypass lanes for ramp meters; c) incident and emergency management systems on all freeways; d) changeable message signs on freeways; e) electronic toll collection systems (FasTrak); f) coordinated traffic signal systems on major arterials; g) BART transit management system; h) bus transit with signal priority capabilities and AVL; and i) transportation management centers for freeways, arterials, BART, bus transit and the Port of Oakland. Transportation facilities in the corridor are highly instrumented with real-time data collection systems. An institutional integration/coordination setting is already in place: the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), California DOT (Caltrans), Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA), BART, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit), and cities in the corridor have a history of cooperation. |
|||
17. Key Words ICM, Integrated Corridor Management, Con Ops, I-880, Oakland, Freeway, Arterial, Transit, bus, rail, Intelligent Transportation Systems, ITS, ramp metering, HOV, electronic toll collection, performance monitoring system, PeMS |
18. Distribution Statement |
||
19. Security Classification (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classification (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No of Pages 290 |
22. Price
|
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)
Reproduction of completed page authorized