ITS - Intelligent Transportation Systems Report ITS Home Page

6.0  Public Web Survey Analysis

A web survey was conducted to investigate the general public’s satisfaction with the RWIDS information in comparison with the traditional Road Report information.  Figure 6-1 shows an annotated screen shot of the ITD Road Report home page (http://164.165.237.41/apps/roadreport/).

Figure 6-1. Computer screen capture.  This figure shows a screen capture of the ITD Road Report home page.

Figure 6–1.  Web Survey Screen Explained

 

6.1  Methodology

Visitors to the ITD Road Report website were invited to participate in an on-line survey during the winter of 2003-2004.  During that time, 134 members of the public completed the survey.  The objectives of this survey were to better understand who the users were of the new RWIDS information as well as the traditional Road Report information; what kinds of trips they were planning with information they derived from the site; the RWIDS features they used and how useful they found these features to be for their trip planning; and suggestions they might have for enhancing the overall value of the site.

A graphical icon and a hypertext link were added to the lower-right corner of the ITD Road Report website to invite users to participate in the web survey.  Upon clicking on the survey link, a screening question is presented to insure that the participants are not related to the ITD or its employees and thus their opinions are not biased.  The web survey was hosted on a separate, high bandwidth computer server in order to facilitate the transmission of large numbers of images data (screen shot of web features) used in the survey.

The basic approach of the survey is to identify those who have used either the traditional Road Reports (reside under the “Idaho Roads”) and/or the new RWIDS information (reside under the “Weather/Pavement Condition and Web Cam”).  The participants were asked to rate the usefulness of each used feature in support of their trip planning.  The Road Condition Reports have been providing road surface conditions of all the state routes based on observations phoned in by the ITS maintenance staff four times a day during the winter season.  One of the ancillary objectives of this evaluation is to investigate the impacts of the RWIDS on the existing road-weather information services.  A replica of the web survey can be found in Appendix C and the results of the survey are summarized in Appendix D.

6.2  Results

In interpreting findings from this survey, it is important to point out that respondents are self-selected; that is, the results of this survey reflect the opinions of only those individuals who decided on their own to respond.  Since the sample of respondents was not scientifically selected, their opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all ITD Road Report site users or of the general population of travelers in and around the state of Idaho.  Nevertheless, these respondents represent a diverse and interested group of users of road-weather information available on the Internet.  Their opinions are helpful in better understanding what types of road-weather information are most useful, how that information is being used, and how web features such as RWIDS can potentially be improved so that they can better serve the general traveling public.

As Figure 6-2 (Question 1) shows, a little over one third (34.3 percent) of the respondents are frequent users of the ITD Road Report website (more than three times a month), more than one-third (35.1 percent) of the respondents said they were visiting for the first time.  Many of the survey questions were designed to probe the experiences with the veteran users of the site and the survey questionnaire was designed to skip those questions for the first time users.

Figure 6-2. Bar chart.  This figure shows the frequency of visiting RWIDS.  35% of users are the first time visitors.  31% visited RWIDS 1 to 3 times per month.  34% visited RWIDS more than 3 times per month.

Figure 6–2 (Q1).  Frequency of Site Use

 

Figure 6-3 (Question 2) excludes the first time users and shows that about 70 percent of the experienced users have used this website for more than one year.

Figure 6-3. Bar chart.  This figure shows about 70% of users have used the web site for more than a year.  About 11% used the web site for 6 to 12 months.  About 19% used the web site for less than 6 months.

Figure 6–3 (Q2).  Length of Time Using the Site

 

Figure 6-4 (Question 3) shows how often this website was used during the four seasons.  It seems fair to conclude that there is more frequent access to this website during winter and spring than other seasons. 

Figure 6-4. Bar chart.  This figure shows the usage frequency by season.

Figure 6–4 (Q3).  Frequency of Use in Different Seasons

 

Figure 6-5 (Question 4) presents the usage frequency by purpose.  Most frequent (frequently and always) reasons for using this website include “check condition for a specific route” (91 percent), “better prepared for driving conditions” (84 percent), “find out weather condition” (72 percent), “find out about road closures”         (72 percent), and “find out condition of a hazardous location” (68 percent).  Those reasons indicate a general need for road-weather-related information in the primarily rural setting of the state of Idaho.  On the other hand, road construction is relatively of lesser concern in terms of travel planning.  Determining which highway to take, travel timing, or whether to cancel a trip are the less likely reasons for using this site.  Understandably, those decisions are subject to the availability of alternatives and flexibility in schedule that vary from case to case.

Figure 6-5. Bar chart.  This figure shows the usage frequency by purpose.

Figure 6–5 (Q4).  Frequency of Use by Purpose

 

Figure 6-6 (Question 5) shows how the information provided by this site was used for various trip types.  It is not a surprise to see that recreational (47 percent) and personal (40 percent) trips are rated higher than commuting trips (19 percent) as the top two reasons the ITS website were consulted upon, possibly due to the rural nature of the state.  The results did show that the usage by commercial drivers is somewhat limited; long haul freight carriers (9 percent) and driving as part of business (22 percent).

Figure 6-6. Bar chart.  This figure shows the usage frequency by type of trip.

Figure 6–6 (Q5).  Type of Trip

 

Figure 6-7 (Question 6.1) indicates what features on the ITD Road Report home page have been used by respondents.  The most accessed feature is the Idaho Roads (87 percent) which contains the traditional (pre-RWIDS) information reported by ITD maintenance.  RWIDS (residing under “weather pavement conditions and web cams”) was the second most frequently used feature (80 percent).  Figure 6-7 shows that the features containing dynamic travel related information (weather, traffic, pavement conditions, constructions, etc.) are among the most accessed; as opposed to the more static or specialized information such as press release, highway data quest (providing color coded maps of various highway statistics).  This indicates that there is a demand for up-to-date information on road and weather condition by the general public.

Figure 6-7. Bar chart.  This figure shows the response to question: which Road Report web features have you used.

Figure 6–7 (Q6.1).  Web Features Used

 

As a follow up to the previous question, the survey asked the respondents to rate the usefulness of each Road Report web feature (Figure 6-8, Question 6.2).  The percentages of respondents who indicated a feature being very useful generally correspond to the results shown in Figure 6-7.  It is consistent that a large percentage of respondents have found the features containing dynamic travel-related information (weather, traffic, pavement conditions, constructions, etc.) useful.

Figure 6-8. Bar chart.  This figure shows ratings of relative usefulness of RWIDS information.

Figure 6–8. (Q6.2).  Usefulness of RWIDS Information

 

Those respondents who indicated they have used “Weather Pavement Conditions and Web Cams” (i.e., RWIDS) were asked about which RWIDS features they used.  Figure 6-9 (Question 6af1) shows that the most accessed RWIDS features are weather-current (87 percent), Idaho roads (a link to the existing Idaho roads that is not part of the RWIDS development)              (86 percent), weather-forecast  (84 percent), weather-pavement (82 percent), cameras               (79 percent), and road closures   (a link to the road closure features that are also accessible from the home page) (78 percent).  Clearly, among less accessed features are those more technical or specialized information such as NWS Alerts, avalanche alerts, and various weather images (satellite, radar, jet stream, isobars, etc.).  

Figure 6-9. Bar chart.  This figure shows what features of RWIDS have been used by the survey respondents.

Figure 6–9 (Q6af1).  RWIDS Features Used

 

Figure 6-10 (Question 6af2) presents the results of respondents’ rating on usefulness of each RWIDS feature.  The usefulness ratings are in general agreement with the results of the previous question.  The most useful RWIDS feature is “cameras” which provides snap shots of image from video/ camera-equipped ESS.  Different from Figure 6-9, a significant portion of respondents have found images from satellite (63 percent) and radar (64 percent) very useful, based on a relatively smaller percentage of respondents who indicated they have used these features.

Figure 6-10. Bar chart.  This figure shows ratings of relative usefulness of RWIDS information.

Figure 6–10 (Q6af2).  Usefulness of RWIDS Information

 

Figure 6-11 (Question 7) shows the agreement with the various statements regarding the attributes of the ITD Road Report website.  Sixty-five percent of the respondents agreed that the Road Report website is well organized.  Fifty-eight percent agreed that the information provided is up to date.  Sixty-two percent agreed that the forecast information is accurate.  Eighty percent agreed that the information helped them better prepare for road weather conditions, 77 percent drove more carefully, 63 percent changed time to travel, and 48 percent canceled their trips based on the information provided by the ITD Road Report website.

Figure 6-11. Bar chart.  This figure shows respondents’ agreement with various site attributes.

Figure 6–11 (Q7).  Agreement with Site Attributes

 

Figure 6-12 (Question 8) shows the other travel information sources the respondents also consulted with.  Seventy-five percent of the respondents also listen to the commercial radio for road-weather related information;   67 percent watched television, and 60 percent used other websites for road-weather information.  It is somewhat surprising that the long time ITD operated interactive telephone number 1-888-IDA-ROAD was only used by 27 percent of the respondents.  Weather radio and newspaper are used by relatively smaller percentage of the respondents.

Figure 6-12. Bar chart.  This figure shows other sources of traveler information used by the respondents.

Figure 6–12 (Q8).  Other Travel Information Sources

Question 9 of the survey provides an opportunity for respondents to provide their suggestions for future improvements of the ITD Road Report website.  The representative comments are summarized in the following.  The parentheses indicate number of similar comments.

Figure 6-13 (Question 10) shows that 86 percent of the respondents live in the state of Idaho with 39 percent from southeastern, 38 percent from southwestern, and 8 percent from northern Idaho.  

Figure 6-13. Bar chart.  This figure shows where the respondents live.

Figure 6–13 (Q10).  Location of Participants

 

Figure 6-14 (Question 11) shows the age distribution of the respondents.  According to the results of question 12 (not shown) 62 percent of the respondents were male and 28 percent female.

Figure 6-14. Bar chart.  This figure shows the age distribution of survey respondents.

Figure 6–14 (Q11).  Age of Participants

 

6.3  Conclusions

5.0 Maintenance Resource Analysis  |  Table of Contents  |  7.0 Commercial Vehicle Operator Interviews